Putting Luke 22:36 into context of Jesus’ teaching.
In the Gospel of Luke, we encounter a curious moment when Jesus instructs his disciples to procure swords. This passage has sparked considerable debate about its interpretation, particularly concerning whether Jesus endorsed the use of weapons for self-defence. A closer examination of the context of this passage and the broader teachings of Jesus reveals that this was a profound misunderstanding by the disciples.
Let’s not misrepresent Jesus’ pacifist stance from this one verse, and allow the whole passage to give us the context of what he wanting of us.
Jesus and the Swords: Misunderstanding by the Disciples
The specific passage in question is found in Luke 22:36-38, where Jesus tells his disciples, “If you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.” When the disciples present two swords, Jesus responds, “That’s enough!”
This response can be perplexing and I will be honest I am unclear exactly what Jesus wanted the swords for… However, several points clarify that Jesus did not intend for these swords to be used for self-defence or attack:
- Jesus’ Reaction to the Disciples’ Misunderstanding (Luke 22:38):
- The disciples bring two swords, and Jesus says, “That’s enough!” This response can be interpreted as a rebuke, implying, “Enough of this misunderstanding.” If Jesus intended for the swords to be for armed defence, two swords would be insufficient for a group of twelve. His statement likely reflects frustration at their literal interpretation of his metaphorical advice or at least his intention for the swords.
- Jesus’ Command During the Arrest (Luke 22:49-51):
- When the authorities come to arrest Jesus, the disciples ask, “Lord, should we strike with our swords?” Jesus’ immediate response, “No more of this!” followed by healing the ear of the high priest’s servant, emphasizes his disapproval of violence.
- Jesus’ Question to the Arresting Crowd (Luke 22:52):
- Jesus confronts the crowd with, “Am I leading a rebellion, that you have come with swords and clubs?” He underscores that his mission is not about armed insurrection but about a different kind of kingdom.
The Broader Teachings of Jesus
The notion that Jesus supported using swords for defence or attack contradicts his broader teachings. Consider the Sermon on the Mount, where Jesus blesses the peacemakers (Matthew 5:9) and instructs them to turn the other cheek (Matthew 5:39). His life and ministry consistently emphasize love, peace, and non-violence.
Consider scales when comparing Jesus teaching. On one side of the scale, we have his whole life, His whole ministry considering his words and actions (Eg love your enemies, turn the other cheek, etc). On the other side, we have this one verse where Jesus can be at least misunderstood by the context of the passage, by his disciples. Jesus did not mean for swords to be used in a violent manner, even self-defence. Which do you see that holds more weight?
Conclusion: A Kingdom Not of This World
Ultimately, Jesus clarifies his stance when he says, “My Kingdom is not an earthly kingdom. If it were, my followers would fight to keep me from being handed over to the Jewish leaders. But my Kingdom is not of this world” (John 18:36). This statement encapsulates Jesus’ message: his kingdom operates on principles entirely different from worldly power and violence.
In light of Jesus’ teachings and actions, it becomes clear that the instruction to carry swords was not a directive for the possibility of violent defence. The disciples misunderstood Jesus’ metaphorical language or intended use of the swords, leading some away from the critical teaching of Jesus’ mission and his non-violent message.
P.S. This article may not fully address or satisfy your question about the meaning of this verse spoken by Jesus. However, it is clear that this passage should not be interpreted as a justification for violence and war, as some have done to support their ideology or theology. Let us remain humble and embrace the teachings of Jesus in their entirety, without misconstruing this passage to be something it is not.
“For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.”
Eph 6:12